On this episode of What within the Phrase?, Kirk E. Miller talks with Richard Middleton about considered one of Christian theology’s most foundational and broadly mentioned concepts: humanity because the picture of God (imago dei). But regardless of how vital this idea is, its which means has lengthy been debated. Does the picture of God consult with some particular human trait, like cause? Does it describe our capability for relationship? Or is it primarily a few process God has given humanity? Collectively Kirk and Richard focus on Genesis 1:26–28 and unpack its theological implications.
Comply with the present on YouTube, Spotify, Apple Podcasts, and extra.
Join with us
Prepared to extend biblical literacy? Like and share. To go the additional mile, go away us a assessment in your most popular platform.
Subscribe to get future episodes. (Bonus: We’ll ship you a reduction to make use of in your first buy.)
Thanks for subscribing to Phrase by Phrase!
Use code WORDBYWORD to save lots of 10% in your first order.
WORDBYWORD
Copy code
Episode visitor: Richard Middleton
J. Richard Middleton is professor emeritus of biblical worldview and exegesis at Northeastern Seminary and Roberts Wesleyan College in Rochester, NY. A local of Jamaica, he immigrated to Canada for graduate research and moved to the USA for a educating place. He’s previous president of the Canadian-American Theological Affiliation (2011–2014) and the Canadian Society of Biblical Research (2019–2021).
Middleton’s analysis space is Previous Testomony theology with a concentrate on creation, struggling, and the ethics of energy. He’s the creator of 5 books; the newest are The Liberating Picture: The Imago Dei in Genesis 1 (Brazos, 2005); A New Heaven and a New Earth: Reclaiming Biblical Eschatology (Baker Educational, 2014); and Abraham’s Silence: The Binding of Isaac, the Struggling of Job, and Easy methods to Discuss Again to God (Baker Educational, 2021). He’s at the moment engaged on two new books, one on the facility dynamics between prophet and king in 1 Samuel and the opposite on biblical worldview for our troubled instances.
Episode synopsis
Setting the scene: the summit of the creation
As Richard Middleton explains, if the three most vital elements of actual property are “location, location, location,” so too the three most vital elements of biblical interpretation are “context, context, context.” For Genesis 1:26–28, this implies,
- Attending to its rapid literary context: its place inside the creation narrative of Genesis 1:1–2:3.
- Deciphering Genesis 1:26–28 alongside different creation texts, most notably Genesis 2 but additionally passages like Psalm 8 and Psalm 104.
- Contemplating how the remainder of Scripture develops the concept of the picture of God.
The creation account in Genesis 1 consists of six days that lead climactically to God’s creation of humanity. Be aware:
- They’re God’s remaining creation. All the things else has led as much as this second.
- Extra textual content is spent on the creation of humanity than some other a part of the creation account.
- Lastly, earlier than creating humanity, God makes a novel announcement: “Allow us to make humankind in our picture” (Gen 1:26). This elevated language alerts that humanity has a particular function in God’s creation.
God assigns humanity a novel process, a specific vocation inside God’s ordered world. People are to train dominion and subdue the earth, thereby reflecting and representing God’s personal sovereignty.
Tragically, nevertheless, the story that follows exhibits how badly humanity misrepresents God, introducing sin and loss of life into God’s good world as a substitute of faithfully caring for it.
What makes interpretation troublesome
The phrase “picture” would possibly counsel one thing visible. But, Kirk asks, what wouldn’t it imply for people to be the picture of a God who’s an invisible spirit (see John 4:24)? Thus this picture should consult with some non-physical, invisible level of correspondence. However what, precisely, is that correspondence?
Whereas the Bible makes use of this phrase, “picture of God,” it nowhere defines or straight explains what it means. This silence leaves room for theological hypothesis and disagreement.
In keeping with Richard, such hypothesis has usually concerned imposing concepts disconnected from Scripture. All through historical past, many theologians have indifferent the phrase from its unique context in Genesis and crammed it with concepts primarily based elsewhere.
The three major views
There have been three major views on what the picture of God is.
Importantly, every of those views says true issues about people. Thus, the purpose of disagreement between the views isn’t whether or not what they affirm is true, however whether or not what they suggest is particularly what it means to be God’s picture.
Discover the picture of God with Logos’s Research Assistant.
Begin your free trial!
1. The substantive view: humanity’s distinctive high quality
The dominant view in Christian theology throughout historical past maintains that the picture of God refers to some shared high quality between God and humanity, often rationality. This view has usually been known as the substantive view as a result of it identifies the picture with some side of human nature (or substance).
In keeping with this view, as a result of God is known to be an invisible divine thoughts, human beings picture God via their rational soul or thoughts. Human cause, morality, or creativity turns into humanity’s distinguishing trait from all different creatures, and thus the defining function of the picture of God. Richard argues that this interpretation turned dominant, partially, as a result of early Christians expressed their religion utilizing Greek philosophical classes, particularly Platonic ones. The consequence was an understanding of the picture of God that centered on immaterial, mental qualities.
A weak spot of this view is that it appears international to the textual content of Genesis 1. The passage doesn’t appear involved straight with humanity’s invisible schools.
Moreover, if the picture of God is recognized with rational capability, this would appear to undermine the standing of these whose cognitive talents are inferior (e.g., infants, the mentally disabled). If rationality defines the picture, this would appear to demand that diminished rationality means diminished dignity. But Scripture clearly guidelines out this conclusion.
2. The relational view: humanity’s capability for relationship
God is triune and thus inherently relational. Likewise, God created humanity for relationship: “female and male he created them” (Gen 1:27). From these observations, some theologians conclude that the picture of God consists in humanity’s capability for relationship—with God or moreover with each other. This view is usually related to figures equivalent to Karl Barth.
A power of this view is that it’s primarily based on options within the textual content of Genesis:
- Instantly earlier than creating humanity in his picture, God refers to himself within the plural, probably signaling his personal relational life (Gen 1:26).
- Instantly following God’s creation of humanity in his picture, he describes this as creation within the type of “female and male” (Gen 1:27).
But Richard contends that relationality alone doesn’t clarify the rapid emphasis in Genesis 1 on the ruling and subduing that follows (Gen 1:28). In fact, humanity was created for relationship. However the query is whether or not relationship is what the picture of God means or whether or not relationship is one enviornment wherein this picture is lived out.
3. The vocational view: humanity’s appointment to symbolize God
A 3rd view is usually known as the practical view, or as Richard prefers to name it, the vocational view. In keeping with this interpretation, human beings are God’s picture as these he has appointed to symbolize his rule on the planet.
This view relies on Genesis 1:26 which particularly states that God made humanity in his picture as a way to rule over God’s creation (see the NET and NIV). In different phrases, humanity’s creation because the picture of God is intently tied to this process and the delegated authority we’re given.
Human beings are known as to symbolize God by the way in which they order, domesticate, and look after God’s creation, thereby representing (or imaging) God’s personal rule over creation. They’re his vice-regents. As God’s earthly representatives, God has assigned humanity a royal-priestly function inside his creation.
We see this within the very subsequent chapter. God creates a backyard after which locations Adam in that backyard to have a tendency it. God is the primary gardener, after which he makes Adam, his picture, a gardener of his backyard. In different phrases, God designs human motion to mirror his personal.
Though Psalm 8 doesn’t use the phrase “picture of God,” it explains that God has topped humanity with glory and honor and given them rule over the works of his palms. Humanity’s royal vocation is central to what it means to be human, made as God’s picture. Likewise, Psalm 104 portrays God offering a fruitful creation whereas people rework its produce into wine, oil, and bread. Human beings are lively brokers inside creation, cultivating and shaping it below God’s authority.
Royal photos in historical Close to Jap context
Some students observe how kings within the historical world have been usually thought of photos (statues) of their gods, representing that deity. Likewise, the statue (idol) in a pagan temple was meant to symbolize its deity.
Like its surrounding historical Close to Jap context, Genesis presents human beings as royal representatives of divine rule. If creation is God’s temple, humanity is his consultant statue in that temple.
However importantly, Genesis democratizes this standing. Not simply kings or clergymen, however all human beings—female and male—are made in God’s picture. On this manner, Genesis critiques pagan faith with its social hierarchies.
The picture as an indelible standing with undiminished dignity
Though the picture of God is vocational (practical), it shouldn’t be lowered to mere perform, in any other case humanity would stop to be God’s picture wherever it did not execute this calling. On the contrary, we see all through Scripture that humanity retains God’s picture even after the autumn and amidst its sin (Gen 5:3). As an illustration, Genesis 9:6 grounds the prohibition of homicide in the truth that people are made in God’s picture. Likewise, James 3:9 says we ought not curse people who find themselves made in God’s likeness. Our vocation stays even when it’s distorted by sin.
As Richard explains, our standing as God’s picture is a present earlier than it’s one thing we stock out. It’s not a conditional perform however God’s immutable appointment. To be the picture of God is what it means to be human.
Thus, the dignity hooked up to being God’s picture isn’t depending on our efficiency. All human beings possess unshakable dignity, no matter age, capability, intercourse, race, social standing, or capability. The doctrine of the picture of God highlights not solely our excessive calling and accountability, but additionally our excessive standing and price. Each individual is a VIP in God’s world.
Picture-bearing as an undercurrent throughout Scripture
In keeping with Richard, the concept of “the picture of God” features as an undercurrent all through a lot of Scripture, even the place its terminology isn’t used. For example, he factors to Proverbs 14:31, the place to mistreat the poor is to point out contempt for his or her Maker. Likewise, Jesus calls us to resemble our Father in heaven by serving others—even loving our enemies (Matt 5:43–48).
But the concept of the picture of God surfaces explicitly at key factors in Scripture. Since humanity failed in its unique image-bearing vocation, God known as Abraham to develop into a supply of blessing to the nations. God turns his unique command (“be fruitful and multiply,” i.e., enhance the variety of image-bearers) right into a promise for Abraham (“I’ll multiply you vastly”; see Gen 17:2; 22:17). Later, God appoints Israel, Abraham’s descendants, as God’s consultant kingdom of clergymen, echoing humanity’s project at creation (Exod 19:5–6). In truth, Israel was to not bear God’s picture in useless (Exod 20:7). They’re to be holy, resembling God’s personal holiness (Lev 19:2). So God’s mission to revive humanity’s calling unfolds covenantally via his folks till it reaches its climax in Christ.
The church then is that new humanity conformed to the picture of Christ, the one who completely bears God’s picture (e.g., Rom 8:29; Col 3:10; 2 Cor 3:18; 4:4). In Christ, humanity is being made into what it was all the time meant to be. So the Nice Fee (Matt 28:18–20) carries ahead the unique creation mandate (Gen 1:26–28) because the church multiplies disciples among the many nations. On this manner, God fulfills his objective, expressed to Abraham, to bless these nations.
Use Logos’s Good Search to seek out the entire Bible’s references to the picture of God. Begin your free trial!
The picture of God for preaching and discipleship
In keeping with Richard, all of discipleship and sanctification is grounded within the imago dei.
- The picture of God has moral implications for the way we deal with every of our fellow human beings. Use no matter privilege and energy you’ve got for the great of others.
- It has ethical implications, as we search to mirror God faithfully in his world. Signify God’s character.
- And it has missional implications as God’s folks perform the Nice Fee. The church is “God’s royal priesthood,” representing God by asserting his excellencies to these round them (1 Pet 2:9).
The result’s a imaginative and prescient of humanity that’s each humbling and ennobling. Human beings aren’t autonomous. They’re creatures. But they’re additionally entrusted with a exceptional function in God’s world. We’re made out of mud (humbling), but topped as his picture (dignifying). To bear the picture of God is to belong to him, to matter deeply, and to be despatched into the world as his representatives.
Preaching the picture of God, subsequently, ought to contain extra than simply dialogue of its thought, however exhortation. The concepts in Scripture are all the time meant to form folks’s worldviews in order that we is likely to be more and more trustworthy followers of Christ.
Logos values considerate and interesting discussions on vital biblical matters. Nevertheless, the views and interpretations offered on this episode are these of the people talking and don’t essentially mirror the official place of Logos. We acknowledge that Christians could maintain completely different views on this passage, and we welcome various engagement and respectful dialogue.
Tell us what you suppose
What view do you discover most convincing? Be part of us within the Phrase by Phrase group to share your ideas.
Richard Middleton’s prompt sources
Extra sources on the picture of God
Associated content material
