What’s expository preaching, and is it nonetheless related in in the present day’s altering world?
On this episode of Logos Dwell, Kirk E. Miller sits down with Pastor David Helm who defines and makes the case for expository preaching as God’s design for his church. Uncover what it actually means to submit your sermon to the biblical textual content.
Comply with the present on YouTube, Spotify, Apple Podcasts, and extra.
Begin a 30-day free trial of Logos
Episode visitor: David Helm
David Helm is senior pastor of Christ Church Chicago. He additionally chairs the board of the Charles Simeon Belief, a company dedicated to equip others to show the Bible. His writings embrace:
Episode synopsis
What’s expository preaching?
In Dave Helm’s ebook, Expository Preaching (Crossway, 2014), he defines expository preaching this manner:
Expositional preaching is empowered preaching that rightfully submits the form and emphasis of the sermon to the form and emphasis of a biblical textual content.
Two phrases are of explicit significance on this definition:
- Emphasis: The first claims or burden of the passage that the Spirit-inspired creator intends to speak.
- Form: The textual content’s divinely supposed kind—its construction, motion, and complete literary technique (e.g., linear argument, comparability/distinction, narrative plot, poetic stanzas).
Expositional preaching happens when the sermon’s content material and intent align with the God-given content material and intent of the passage.
Kirk introduces the next classes: Each passage makes a declare (its acknowledged or implied message) and has an purpose (its supposed response or transformative intent). In different phrases, expositional preachers ought to all the time ask themselves as they put together, “What’s God in search of to get finished on this explicit textual content?” Expositional preaching seeks to get finished within the sermon what God seeks to get finished via this explicit passage.
What expository preaching isn’t
Expositional preaching, then, shouldn’t be merely preaching true issues from a biblical passage, however preaching the precise message of a biblical passage. The sermon’s message is the passage’s message. Put otherwise, the passage’s message turns into the sermon’s.
Moreover, expositional preaching shouldn’t be a operating “verbal commentary” on a passage. It, after all, entails clearly and precisely explaining a passage. However since Scripture goals to do greater than relay data however to impress transformation, preaching that matches the intent of Scripture (expositional preaching) should transfer past mere rationalization to exhortation, addressing minds, consciences, and wills.
How is expositional preaching totally different from topical preaching?
Each sermon, even expositional ones, must have a subject. However in topical preaching (as normally understood), a subject serves because the organizing precept of a sermon. Though topical preaching typically makes use of a number of passages, topical preaching may also be finished from a singular textual content. The preacher begins with a subject (e.g., stewardship, parenting), then assembles various texts, or only one textual content, to serve that matter.
Now, topical messages might—and may—be exegetical. They need to say true issues from the textual content. However they differ from expositional sermons in that they preach a subject from the textual content versus preaching the very message of the textual content. On this manner, the preacher serves as a little bit of the architect of the sermon, offering its agenda and construction as an alternative of deriving this stuff from a given passage.
Kirk provides a clarifying remark: Lectio continua, preaching sequentially, passage-by-passage, via a ebook of the Bible, is usually related to expository preaching. Those that exposit typically achieve this through lectio cotinua. However, as Kirk suggests, the 2 are distinct.
- As an example, one might (deliberately or unintentionally) preach a sequence of topical messages whereas working passage-by-passage via a ebook of the Bible. In different phrases, simply since you preach passage-by-passage via a ebook doesn’t essentially imply your sermons are expositional.
- Conversely, one might preach a sermon sequence working via a group of passages that deal with a standard theme (a thematic sermon sequence). But the person sermons on every of these passage is perhaps expositional.
Strive writing sermons in Logos. Get began with a free trial in the present day!
What function does a textual content’s construction play in sermon growth?
Whether or not a Pauline argument, narrative plot, poetic stanzas, or a chiastic sample, a passage’s construction reveals its emphasis. A passage’s construction is the skeleton on which the meat of a passage (its content material) hangs. The way in which an creator organizes a passage—the way in which it’s organized—turns into the car for speaking its argument.
As such, in expositional preaching, one’s sermon (or homiletical) define must be managed by the passage’s construction. This doesn’t imply one’s sermon define essentially regurgitates the define of a passage, replicating its precise sequence. Actually, the 2 will typically differ. Nonetheless, as a result of expositional preaching goals to evangelise the argument of the textual content, it would essentially learn by and take its cues from that argument’s construction.
This additionally helps the congregation comply with the logic of the passage itself.
Relatedly, some texts lend themselves higher to a deductive exposition (state the principle level, then show it); others to an inductive strategy (lead hearers via the passage towards the conclusion). In both case although, the homiletical resolution and execution ought to be ruled by the way in which the textual content itself develops its argument (i.e., its construction).
What ought to be included in—or ignored of—a sermon?
Figuring out a passage’s argument—and the way it makes its argument—goes a good distance in serving to a preacher resolve what to incorporate and what to go away out of a sermon. The important thing query of exegesis is, “How is that this passage’s argument developed throughout the textual content?” A key query for the sermon then turns into, “What are the most vital exegetical insights for exhibiting and speaking this argument to my congregation?”
A sermon shouldn’t be a “present and inform” of all of your exegetical homework from the previous week. Preachers should develop to differentiate the attention-grabbing from the vital.
Not each exegetical perception wants—or ought—to be included in a sermon. A sermon shouldn’t be a “present and inform” of all of your exegetical homework from the previous week. Reasonably, preachers should develop to differentiate the attention-grabbing from the vital, studying to go away the previous of their examine and produce the latter into the pulpit. Like butchers who depart scraps on the reducing room flooring, devoted preachers have to be prepared to discard even good materials that doesn’t serve the sermon’s central goal.
Does Christ-centered preaching violate expositional preaching?
Kirk raises a generally felt pressure: If expositional preaching is about preaching the message of a passage, does preaching Christ from all of Scripture contradict exposition, particularly when Jesus isn’t explicitly talked about in a textual content?
In keeping with Dave, the Outdated Testomony is the “pre-proclamation” of the gospel regarding the individual and work of Christ (see Luke 24:44–47; Rom 1:1–4). As such, Jesus serves because the organizing interpretive precept of the Bible. Subsequently, Christian preaching ought to responsibly and organically relate each textual content to Christ, reflecting the Bible’s personal testimony that the Scriptures communicate of Christ.
The phrases “responsibly” and “organically” are key right here, although. Devoted Christ-centered exposition won’t impose connections to Christ divorced from, or that run roughshod over, the passage’s authentic authorial intent. Connection to Christ ought to come up from the which means and message of the textual content itself.
Like a movie whose principal character shouldn’t be in each scene but stays central to the story, so too Christ is the via line of all of Scripture even when not explicitly named. Finished properly, Christ-centered preaching shouldn’t be an add-on to exposition however a part of exposition that grasps the unity of Scripture as centered in Christ.
What are the advantages of expositional preaching for pastors & congregations?
God speaks and acts via his Phrase. From as early as Genesis 1, the place God creates via his Phrase, to the prophets, to the revelation of his Son, to the apostles, God accomplishes his redemptive exercise via his Phrase. To expound Scripture, then, is to deliver individuals into an encounter with God’s personal voice. When God’s Phrase is expounded, the church hears the Spirit communicate (see Heb 3:7). If we wish to hear God’s voice, we should go to the place he has preserved it: his Phrase.
Kirk additionally notes how exposition liberates pastors from the strain of needing to invent novel, intelligent messages every week. Exposition relieves the preacher from having to plan an authentic thought every week, and as an alternative places him within the place of steward of God’s message.
Lastly, exposition protects the conscience of the members of the congregation. By rooting sermons in God’s Phrase, who alone is Lord of the conscience (Rom 14:4), it guards once more the whims, opinions, or private judgements of a pastor.
Sources on expository preaching
Associated articles
