Members of Congress have voted to sentence the assassination of conservative influencer Charlie Kirk and political violence, generally, as mourners put together for his memorial on Sunday.
Each chambers of Congress on Friday handed resolutions condemning Kirk’s politically motivated assassination final week. Kirk, 31, greatest recognized for founding the conservative advocacy group Turning Level USA and TPUSA Religion, was killed by 22-year-old Tyler Robinson at Utah Valley College final Wednesday as he was headlining an occasion on campus.
Whereas the decision within the Republican-controlled U.S. Senate handed unanimously, a big variety of Democrats within the Republican-controlled U.S. Home of Representatives opposed the model handed within the decrease chamber.
On Tuesday, the U.S. Senate handed Senate Decision 391 in a unanimous vote. The decision “condemns the assassination of Charlie Kirk within the strongest potential phrases,” presents condolences to Kirk’s spouse and youngsters, and “honors Charlie Kirk’s dedication to the constitutional rules of civil dialogue and debate between all folks of america, no matter political affiliation.”
On Friday, the Republican-controlled Home voted 310-58 in favor of passing Home Decision 719. The decision “condemns within the strongest potential phrases” Kirk’s assassination and all types of political violence, expresses gratitude to regulation enforcement for catching his killer and presents sympathy to Kirk’s household, along with honoring the late activist’s dedication to “the Structure, civil discourse, and Biblical reality.”
The decision additionally calls on People to “reject political violence, recommit to respectful debate, uphold American values, and respect each other as fellow People.” No Republicans opposed the measure, though 4 didn’t vote on it.
Ninety-five Home Democrats voted for the decision, accounting for slightly below half of the Home Democratic Caucus. In the meantime, 58 Democrats voted towards the decision and 38 voted “current.” The remaining 22 didn’t vote.
The entire Democrats who voted towards the decision are non-white, with two exceptions: Reps. Seth Moulton, D-Mass., and Mike Quigley, D-Ailing.
Many of the Democrats who voted towards the decision signify congressional districts that Democrat Kamala Harris carried by double digits within the 2024 presidential election, with the exceptions of Reps. Sanford Bishop, D-Ga., Shomari Figures, D-Ala., Jahana Hayes, D-Conn., Steven Horsford, D-Nev., Raja Krishnamoorthi, D-Ailing., Emilia Sykes, D-Ohio, and Lauren Underwood, D-Ailing.
In the meantime, all three members of Home management supported the measure: Minority Chief Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., Minority Whip Katherine Clark, D-Mass., and Chair of the Home Democratic Caucus, Pete Aguilar, D-Calif.
Democrats who supported the decision come from a combination of secure seats and aggressive districts. All however one Democrat who represents a district carried by President Donald Trump within the 2024 presidential election voted for the decision. Rep. Gabriel Vasquez, D-N.M., voted “current.”
Whereas most lawmakers and political figures on either side of the aisle condemned Kirk’s homicide final week — with some exceptions like Ilhan Omar, D-Minn. — a number of academics and professors throughout the U.S. have confronted suspension or termination for making vile remarks on social media about Kirk’s dying. Matthew Dowd, who previously served as an MSNBC political analyst, was fired for suggesting on air that Kirk invited his assassination by participating in “hate speech.”
Ryan Foley is a reporter for The Christian Submit. He could be reached at: ryan.foley@christianpost.com
Members of Congress have voted to sentence the assassination of conservative influencer Charlie Kirk and political violence, generally, as mourners put together for his memorial on Sunday.
Each chambers of Congress on Friday handed resolutions condemning Kirk’s politically motivated assassination final week. Kirk, 31, greatest recognized for founding the conservative advocacy group Turning Level USA and TPUSA Religion, was killed by 22-year-old Tyler Robinson at Utah Valley College final Wednesday as he was headlining an occasion on campus.
Whereas the decision within the Republican-controlled U.S. Senate handed unanimously, a big variety of Democrats within the Republican-controlled U.S. Home of Representatives opposed the model handed within the decrease chamber.
On Tuesday, the U.S. Senate handed Senate Decision 391 in a unanimous vote. The decision “condemns the assassination of Charlie Kirk within the strongest potential phrases,” presents condolences to Kirk’s spouse and youngsters, and “honors Charlie Kirk’s dedication to the constitutional rules of civil dialogue and debate between all folks of america, no matter political affiliation.”
On Friday, the Republican-controlled Home voted 310-58 in favor of passing Home Decision 719. The decision “condemns within the strongest potential phrases” Kirk’s assassination and all types of political violence, expresses gratitude to regulation enforcement for catching his killer and presents sympathy to Kirk’s household, along with honoring the late activist’s dedication to “the Structure, civil discourse, and Biblical reality.”
The decision additionally calls on People to “reject political violence, recommit to respectful debate, uphold American values, and respect each other as fellow People.” No Republicans opposed the measure, though 4 didn’t vote on it.
Ninety-five Home Democrats voted for the decision, accounting for slightly below half of the Home Democratic Caucus. In the meantime, 58 Democrats voted towards the decision and 38 voted “current.” The remaining 22 didn’t vote.
The entire Democrats who voted towards the decision are non-white, with two exceptions: Reps. Seth Moulton, D-Mass., and Mike Quigley, D-Ailing.
Many of the Democrats who voted towards the decision signify congressional districts that Democrat Kamala Harris carried by double digits within the 2024 presidential election, with the exceptions of Reps. Sanford Bishop, D-Ga., Shomari Figures, D-Ala., Jahana Hayes, D-Conn., Steven Horsford, D-Nev., Raja Krishnamoorthi, D-Ailing., Emilia Sykes, D-Ohio, and Lauren Underwood, D-Ailing.
In the meantime, all three members of Home management supported the measure: Minority Chief Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., Minority Whip Katherine Clark, D-Mass., and Chair of the Home Democratic Caucus, Pete Aguilar, D-Calif.
Democrats who supported the decision come from a combination of secure seats and aggressive districts. All however one Democrat who represents a district carried by President Donald Trump within the 2024 presidential election voted for the decision. Rep. Gabriel Vasquez, D-N.M., voted “current.”
Whereas most lawmakers and political figures on either side of the aisle condemned Kirk’s homicide final week — with some exceptions like Ilhan Omar, D-Minn. — a number of academics and professors throughout the U.S. have confronted suspension or termination for making vile remarks on social media about Kirk’s dying. Matthew Dowd, who previously served as an MSNBC political analyst, was fired for suggesting on air that Kirk invited his assassination by participating in “hate speech.”
Ryan Foley is a reporter for The Christian Submit. He could be reached at: ryan.foley@christianpost.com
Members of Congress have voted to sentence the assassination of conservative influencer Charlie Kirk and political violence, generally, as mourners put together for his memorial on Sunday.
Each chambers of Congress on Friday handed resolutions condemning Kirk’s politically motivated assassination final week. Kirk, 31, greatest recognized for founding the conservative advocacy group Turning Level USA and TPUSA Religion, was killed by 22-year-old Tyler Robinson at Utah Valley College final Wednesday as he was headlining an occasion on campus.
Whereas the decision within the Republican-controlled U.S. Senate handed unanimously, a big variety of Democrats within the Republican-controlled U.S. Home of Representatives opposed the model handed within the decrease chamber.
On Tuesday, the U.S. Senate handed Senate Decision 391 in a unanimous vote. The decision “condemns the assassination of Charlie Kirk within the strongest potential phrases,” presents condolences to Kirk’s spouse and youngsters, and “honors Charlie Kirk’s dedication to the constitutional rules of civil dialogue and debate between all folks of america, no matter political affiliation.”
On Friday, the Republican-controlled Home voted 310-58 in favor of passing Home Decision 719. The decision “condemns within the strongest potential phrases” Kirk’s assassination and all types of political violence, expresses gratitude to regulation enforcement for catching his killer and presents sympathy to Kirk’s household, along with honoring the late activist’s dedication to “the Structure, civil discourse, and Biblical reality.”
The decision additionally calls on People to “reject political violence, recommit to respectful debate, uphold American values, and respect each other as fellow People.” No Republicans opposed the measure, though 4 didn’t vote on it.
Ninety-five Home Democrats voted for the decision, accounting for slightly below half of the Home Democratic Caucus. In the meantime, 58 Democrats voted towards the decision and 38 voted “current.” The remaining 22 didn’t vote.
The entire Democrats who voted towards the decision are non-white, with two exceptions: Reps. Seth Moulton, D-Mass., and Mike Quigley, D-Ailing.
Many of the Democrats who voted towards the decision signify congressional districts that Democrat Kamala Harris carried by double digits within the 2024 presidential election, with the exceptions of Reps. Sanford Bishop, D-Ga., Shomari Figures, D-Ala., Jahana Hayes, D-Conn., Steven Horsford, D-Nev., Raja Krishnamoorthi, D-Ailing., Emilia Sykes, D-Ohio, and Lauren Underwood, D-Ailing.
In the meantime, all three members of Home management supported the measure: Minority Chief Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., Minority Whip Katherine Clark, D-Mass., and Chair of the Home Democratic Caucus, Pete Aguilar, D-Calif.
Democrats who supported the decision come from a combination of secure seats and aggressive districts. All however one Democrat who represents a district carried by President Donald Trump within the 2024 presidential election voted for the decision. Rep. Gabriel Vasquez, D-N.M., voted “current.”
Whereas most lawmakers and political figures on either side of the aisle condemned Kirk’s homicide final week — with some exceptions like Ilhan Omar, D-Minn. — a number of academics and professors throughout the U.S. have confronted suspension or termination for making vile remarks on social media about Kirk’s dying. Matthew Dowd, who previously served as an MSNBC political analyst, was fired for suggesting on air that Kirk invited his assassination by participating in “hate speech.”
Ryan Foley is a reporter for The Christian Submit. He could be reached at: ryan.foley@christianpost.com
Members of Congress have voted to sentence the assassination of conservative influencer Charlie Kirk and political violence, generally, as mourners put together for his memorial on Sunday.
Each chambers of Congress on Friday handed resolutions condemning Kirk’s politically motivated assassination final week. Kirk, 31, greatest recognized for founding the conservative advocacy group Turning Level USA and TPUSA Religion, was killed by 22-year-old Tyler Robinson at Utah Valley College final Wednesday as he was headlining an occasion on campus.
Whereas the decision within the Republican-controlled U.S. Senate handed unanimously, a big variety of Democrats within the Republican-controlled U.S. Home of Representatives opposed the model handed within the decrease chamber.
On Tuesday, the U.S. Senate handed Senate Decision 391 in a unanimous vote. The decision “condemns the assassination of Charlie Kirk within the strongest potential phrases,” presents condolences to Kirk’s spouse and youngsters, and “honors Charlie Kirk’s dedication to the constitutional rules of civil dialogue and debate between all folks of america, no matter political affiliation.”
On Friday, the Republican-controlled Home voted 310-58 in favor of passing Home Decision 719. The decision “condemns within the strongest potential phrases” Kirk’s assassination and all types of political violence, expresses gratitude to regulation enforcement for catching his killer and presents sympathy to Kirk’s household, along with honoring the late activist’s dedication to “the Structure, civil discourse, and Biblical reality.”
The decision additionally calls on People to “reject political violence, recommit to respectful debate, uphold American values, and respect each other as fellow People.” No Republicans opposed the measure, though 4 didn’t vote on it.
Ninety-five Home Democrats voted for the decision, accounting for slightly below half of the Home Democratic Caucus. In the meantime, 58 Democrats voted towards the decision and 38 voted “current.” The remaining 22 didn’t vote.
The entire Democrats who voted towards the decision are non-white, with two exceptions: Reps. Seth Moulton, D-Mass., and Mike Quigley, D-Ailing.
Many of the Democrats who voted towards the decision signify congressional districts that Democrat Kamala Harris carried by double digits within the 2024 presidential election, with the exceptions of Reps. Sanford Bishop, D-Ga., Shomari Figures, D-Ala., Jahana Hayes, D-Conn., Steven Horsford, D-Nev., Raja Krishnamoorthi, D-Ailing., Emilia Sykes, D-Ohio, and Lauren Underwood, D-Ailing.
In the meantime, all three members of Home management supported the measure: Minority Chief Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., Minority Whip Katherine Clark, D-Mass., and Chair of the Home Democratic Caucus, Pete Aguilar, D-Calif.
Democrats who supported the decision come from a combination of secure seats and aggressive districts. All however one Democrat who represents a district carried by President Donald Trump within the 2024 presidential election voted for the decision. Rep. Gabriel Vasquez, D-N.M., voted “current.”
Whereas most lawmakers and political figures on either side of the aisle condemned Kirk’s homicide final week — with some exceptions like Ilhan Omar, D-Minn. — a number of academics and professors throughout the U.S. have confronted suspension or termination for making vile remarks on social media about Kirk’s dying. Matthew Dowd, who previously served as an MSNBC political analyst, was fired for suggesting on air that Kirk invited his assassination by participating in “hate speech.”
Ryan Foley is a reporter for The Christian Submit. He could be reached at: ryan.foley@christianpost.com
