Is President Obama below legal investigation? As many within the nation accuse the previous President of treason, Director of Nationwide Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard appeared to trace on Wednesday that that could be the case.
Get prayer updates from IFA.
From Breitbart:
In a briefing with reporters on the White Home, Gabbard laid out the proof that had been launched on Friday and Monday from beforehand categorised studies, exhibiting that the outgoing Obama administration rejected intelligence assessments that stated Russia had not interfered meaningfully within the 2016 election, and ready a brand new evaluation that reached the alternative conclusion, ostensibly to implicate President-elect Donald Trump and to undermine — and maybe take away — his new administration.
Requested by Townhall reporter Katie Pavlich whether or not “any of this new info implicates former President Obama in legal conduct,” Gabbard responded: “We’ve referred and can proceed to refer all of those doc to the Division of Justice and the FBI uh to analyze the legal implications of this.”
She added: “The proof that we have now discovered and that we have now launch straight level to President Obama main the manufacturing of this intelligence evaluation. There are a number of items of proof and intelligence that affirm that truth.”
This comes because the Trump administration has launched proof exhibiting that the Obama administration helped manage the Russia collusion hoax that plagued President Trump’s marketing campaign in 2016. Many on the Proper, included Director Gabbard at one level, have accused President Obama of treason within the wake of those revelations.
Whether or not Obama is below investigation or will face legal fees, nonetheless, continues to be unclear. When requested point-blank whether or not any of the launched info implicates Obama in legal conduct, Director Gabbard refused to reply outright. Relatively, she merely stated she has referred paperwork to the DOJ and the FBI as a way to examine the legal implications.” That would imply that Director Gabbard feels Obama is responsible of legal conduct. It might additionally imply, nonetheless, that she’s leaving that as much as different Trump officers to resolve.
Additional complicating issues within the Supreme Court docket’s presidential immunity ruling. As Breitbart notes, the Supreme Court docket dominated final 12 months that presidents can’t be prosecuted “for actions taken below their constitutional authority.” The identical ruling that protected President Trump final 12 months could shield Obama now. When requested about this constitutional query, each Director Gabbard and White Home Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt refused to reply.
So will President Obama face legal fees? We will’t say something definitively presently. As intercessors, nonetheless, we are going to proceed to hope for biblical justice, no matter that justice could appear like. We could not know the reality about Obama’s actions, however God does!
What do you consider President Obama’s actions in 2016? Share your ideas and prayers beneath.
(Excerpt from Breitbart)
